Architecting real-time AI inference on Alibaba Cloud is a brutal mental transition from basic data science to hardcore distributed systems engineering. Auditing massive cloud environments reveals a recurring theme: training a foundation model in a local environment is the easy part. A data science team trains a foundation model on their workstation, the model works beautifully during local testing, and then they throw a massive multi-gigabyte weight file over the wall to the infrastructure team, fully expecting them to make it scale for a global user base by Friday.
Training a model is merely a bounded problem with a clear end state. The true engineering nightmare—the one that dictates whether your artificial intelligence feature actually drives revenue or just violently drains your operational budget—is serving that model in production. We are talking about sub-50 millisecond latency, infinite scalability, and heavily optimized unit economics.
Enterprises burn tens of thousands of dollars on idle high-end hardware because they treat machine learning models like standard web APIs built in Node.js or Python. They absolutely are not. They do not scale the same way, they do not fail the same way, and they certainly do not cost the same. This guide provides the production-grade blueprint our team uses when architecting pipelines for enterprise clients. We are going way past the official documentation here to look at what actually works in the trenches, what breaks under heavy load, and how to fix it before the executive team asks why the cloud bill doubled over the weekend.
Are you bleeding cash on idle compute? If your team is struggling with orchestration, weird latency spikes, or spiraling compute costs, you do not have to figure it out by trial and error. Book an architecture strategy call with our cloud engineers today.
1. The Core Infrastructure: The Illusion of Choice
Before drawing boxes and arrows on a whiteboard, you must intimately understand the compute primitives you are working with. Alibaba Cloud gives you three main paths for machine learning inference. On paper, they all look fantastic. The marketing materials will tell you they all scale infinitely. In reality, choosing the wrong one will hamstring your engineering velocity for years. Here is how we actually evaluate them for production workloads.
1.1 Platform for AI – Elastic Algorithm Service (PAI-EAS)
PAI-EAS is the fully managed model-serving platform provided by the cloud provider. Think of it as serverless compute, but heavily optimized for synchronous hardware-accelerated inference rather than lightweight web functions.
1.1.1 The Reality Check
Our consulting experience shows that this is the absolute fastest path to production. Recommending this for startups or enterprise teams that do not have a dedicated Kubernetes Site Reliability Engineering squad is almost always the right move. It abstracts away the absolute nightmare of hardware driver compatibility, compute version mismatches, and container orchestration. You give the platform a model artifact, define the hardware, and it provisions a scalable endpoint.
The trade-off is visibility. It is essentially a black box. When it works, it feels like pure magic. When something breaks deep in the stack—such as a memory leak during dynamic batching—you cannot simply access the node via secure shell and run hardware monitoring tools. You are largely at the mercy of support tickets.
1.1.2 Real-World Scenario
During a recent deployment for an e-commerce client, our engineers used this service to scale a recommendation engine. During a massive flash sale, traffic spiked forty times the baseline in about two minutes. The platform scaled the cluster from 2 to 40 nodes in under 45 seconds. But here is the secret the official documentation does not emphasize: it only worked because we pre-warmed the model weights. If you do not bake your model into the image or use a distributed caching layer, pulling a massive language model from object storage during a scale-up event will cause rolling timeouts. It handles bursty consumer traffic beautifully, but you have to configure your autoscaler to anticipate load, not just react to it blindly.
1.2 Elastic Compute Service (ECS) with Heterogeneous Computing
For workloads demanding custom kernel tuning, proprietary networking sidecars, or absolute bare-metal control, you need specialized compute instances.
1.2.1 Container Hardware Technology
This is a major secret weapon, and surprisingly few engineers understand how it differs from native hardware partitioning. Slicing up top-tier hardware at the physical hardware level is rigid. The proprietary container isolation technology is a kernel-level memory and compute isolation system. It allows multiple containers to share one physical card fluidly, even on older architectures.
Serving five different small-scale micro-models by dedicating a whole high-end instance to each one is architectural malpractice. You are throwing money in a fire. Use container isolation to slice that hardware into smaller logical units.
1.2.2 Provisioning Isolated Networks
Auditing an architecture and seeing public IP addresses attached directly to inference nodes is an automatic failure. Do not expose your heavy compute to the open internet. Always isolate your instances deep in a private subnet and route traffic through an internal load balancer or a strict API gateway.
Here is what a production-grade, isolated deployment looks like in infrastructure-as-code. Notice the specific disk type. Model loading is heavily input/output bound. If you use cheap, standard block storage, your expensive hardware sits completely idle for 10 minutes while weights slowly trickle into memory.
Terraform
resource "alicloud_vpc" "ai_vpc" {
vpc_name = "prod-ai-inference-vpc"
cidr_block = "10.0.0.0/16"
}
resource "alicloud_vswitch" "ai_vsw" {
vpc_id = alicloud_vpc.ai_vpc.id
cidr_block = "10.0.1.0/24"
zone_id = "primary-region-zone-i"
vswitch_name = "hardware-inference-subnet"
}
resource "alicloud_instance" "hardware_inference_node" {
availability_zone = "primary-region-zone-i"
instance_type = "ecs.gn7i-c16g1.4xlarge"
vswitch_id = alicloud_vswitch.ai_vsw.id
security_groups = [alicloud_security_group.ai_sg.id]
# Do not cheap out on storage speeds here. Disk speed dictates cold start times.
system_disk_category = "cloud_essd"
system_disk_size = 100
image_id = "aliyun_3_x64_20G_alibase_20240101.vhd"
# Inject startup script to install hardware drivers, runtimes, and telemetry
user_data = base64encode(file("${path.module}/scripts/install_hardware_deps.sh"))
}
1.3 Container Service for Kubernetes (ACK) with Cloud-Native AI Suite
Managed Kubernetes is the undisputed heavyweight champion for massive enterprise deployments.
1.3.1 The Consultant’s Take
Building this for the vast majority of our enterprise clients yields the best long-term results. By injecting the specialized cloud-native suite into the cluster, you turn standard Kubernetes into a highly specialized machine learning operations powerhouse. The most valuable component here is the data orchestration and caching layer that sits inside your cluster, keeping weights warm across the network.
1.3.2 Operational Warnings
Do not adopt managed Kubernetes for machine learning if your team does not already know Kubernetes inside and out. Hardware scheduling is incredibly unforgiving. Taints, tolerations, node selectors, and device plugins will heavily punish teams that lack operational maturity. You will end up with pods stuck in a pending state forever while your expensive compute resources sit completely empty, burning through your budget.
Terraform
resource "alicloud_cs_kubernetes_node_pool" "hardware_pool" {
cluster_id = alicloud_cs_managed_kubernetes.default.id
node_pool_name = "inference-hardware-pool"
vswitch_ids = [alicloud_vswitch.ai_vsw.id]
instance_types = ["ecs.gn7i-c16g1.4xlarge"]
desired_size = 3
# Automatically install the correct runtime. Do not try to manage this manually.
runtime_name = "containerd"
runtime_version = "1.6.20"
labels = {
"node-role.kubernetes.io/hardware" = "true"
"model-tier" = "llm-serving"
}
}
2. Reference Architectures for Real-Time Inference
Stop reinventing the wheel from scratch. Your core architecture dictates your absolute latency floor and your operational ceiling. Below are the three production-grade topologies utilized by elite engineering teams. Pick the one that actually matches your team’s engineering maturity and compliance requirements.
2.1 Pattern 1: Fully Managed Serverless Inference (The Startup Approach)
2.1.1 Traffic Flow
Client Application -> API Gateway -> Virtual Private Cloud Link -> Managed Endpoint -> Foundation Model.
2.1.2 Decision Logic
Use this specific architecture when time-to-market is your primary performance indicator. You do not have to patch operating systems. You do not have to write complex scaling logic. You just push your artifacts to storage and get to work building the actual product features your end users care about.
2.1.3 When to Avoid This Pattern
When your security compliance requires proprietary data-anonymizing sidecar proxies running in the exact same network namespace as the inference engine, avoid this. Serverless platforms will not let you inject custom sidecars easily. If you are handling highly regulated health data and need to strip personal information before it hits the compute memory, look at the next pattern.
Here is how you secure that endpoint so it never touches the public internet. Drop a private link endpoint directly into your isolated network via the command line interface:
Bash
aliyun privatelink CreateVpcEndpoint \
--RegionId primary-region \
--VpcId vpc-bp1abcd12345 \
--SecurityGroupId sg-bp1xyz987 \
--ServiceName com.aliyun.primary-region.eas.secure
2.2 Pattern 2: Cloud-Native Microservices Inference (The Enterprise Approach)
2.2.1 Architecture Flow
Domain Name System -> Application Load Balancer -> Ingress Controller -> Inference Server Pods (with hardware isolation).
2.2.2 Engineering Experience
This represents the absolute gold standard for mature teams. We almost exclusively pair high-performance inference servers written in lower-level languages with strict memory allocation. Why? Because a standard Python web application has absolutely no business serving massive language models in production. Python handles requests sequentially by default due to its global interpreter lock. Advanced inference servers are written in C++ and can execute dynamic batching, model ensembling, and concurrent execution natively out of the box.
This pattern gives clients unified deployment pipelines alongside their standard microservices, and absolute, granular control over the network mesh.
2.2.3 Deploying with Internal Load Balancing
First, establish the deployment configuration. Notice the request for fractional memory via a custom resource definition, ensuring you do not consume a whole integer card for a small task.
YAML
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: advanced-inference-server
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: inference
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: inference
spec:
containers:
- name: server
image: custom-registry/inference-server:latest
resources:
limits:
# Utilizing isolation for fractional allocation.
# We only need 8GB, do not hog the whole card.
aliyun.com/gpu-mem: "8G"
ports:
- containerPort: 8000 # HTTP
- containerPort: 8001 # gRPC
2.3 Pattern 3: Edge-Cloud Hybrid Inference (The Ultra-Low Latency Approach)
2.3.1 Traffic Flow
Local camera feed -> Edge Node -> Cloud Sync via Message Queues -> Heavy Cloud Inference Retraining.
2.3.2 Real-World Scenario
Designing this for a massive manufacturing plant that was sorting defective parts on a high-speed conveyor belt at 60 frames per second proved the limitations of cloud-only infrastructure.
Initially, the client wanted to run everything centrally in the cloud. Doing the math revealed a major flaw. A round-trip from the factory floor to the primary cloud region took 70 milliseconds. At 60 frames per second, the physical part was already past the robotic sorting arm before the inference result even came back. Cloud-only was physically impossible and would result in massive operational failure.
Instead, deploying edge management software to industrial computers right on the factory floor solved the physics problem. Running a quantized computer vision model locally dropped the latency to 8 milliseconds per frame. The system only sent the anomaly metadata (the images of the actual defects) back to the cloud via message queues for asynchronous dashboarding and overnight model retraining.
Building for global scale? Cross-border latency and strict compliance laws can instantly break generic cloud architectures. Specializing in enterprise network configurations and optimized edge inference is necessary. Let’s discuss your global expansion strategy.
3. Step-by-Step Guide: Deploying a Large Language Model
Let’s get our hands dirty with actual implementation. We are going to deploy an open-source 7-billion parameter language model using best practices.
3.1 Step 1: Containerize and Push
3.1.1 Image Optimization
Do not rely on massive base images like a standard operating system and then simply install package managers. Auditing teams often reveals 15-gigabyte bloated containers that take absolutely forever to pull over the network. Use optimized deep learning containers, and utilize multi-stage builds to strip out build dependencies before pushing to the container registry. Every gigabyte saved is time saved during an autoscaling event.
Dockerfile
FROM optimized-registry/deep-learning-base:latest
WORKDIR /app
# Only copy requirements first to leverage Docker layer caching
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt
COPY ./model_server.py .
CMD ["python", "model_server.py"]
3.1.2 Registry Push
Build and push it to your private registry localized to your primary deployment region:
Bash
docker build -t registry.primary-region.aliyuncs.com/my-corp/llm-server:v1 .
docker push registry.primary-region.aliyuncs.com/my-corp/llm-server:v1
3.2 Step 2: Create the Service Configuration
3.2.1 Defining Hardware
You define your hardware limits and model paths in a simple configuration file. Note the resource tag here. We are specifically asking for top-tier compute hardware suited for matrix multiplication.
JSON
{
"name": "llm_prod_inference",
"model_path": "oss://my-corp-ml-models/llm-7b-optimized/",
"processor": "standard_llm",
"metadata": {
"instance": 2,
"cpu": 16,
"gpu": 1,
"memory": 64000,
"resource": "compute.meta.hardware.advanced"
},
"cloud": {
"computing": {
"instance_type": "ecs.gn7i-c16g1.4xlarge"
}
}
}
3.3 Step 3: Deploy via Command Line
3.3.1 Execution and Troubleshooting
Use the command-line tool associated with the managed platform. It handles the deployment logic, provisions the instances, pulls the image, and mounts the object storage bucket natively.
Bash
deploy-cmd create service.json
deploy-cmd check-status -w
Wait until the status flips to a running state. If it gets stuck in a creating state, nine times out of ten it is because your virtual network does not have a network translation gateway attached, and the private node literally cannot reach out to the registry to pull the container image.
4. Performance Optimization: Stop Treating AI Like Web Apps
If you take nothing else away from this architectural blueprint, remember this: standard web application optimization techniques do not map to heavy machine learning inference. You have to optimize for memory bandwidth and sheer network physics.
4.1 Geographic Network Latency
4.1.1 The Laws of Physics
The speed of light is undefeated. Complaining that an inference cluster is “too slow” when the model takes 300 milliseconds to respond usually points to networking, not compute. Digging into telemetry often shows the actual model inference time on the hardware was 45 milliseconds. The other 255 milliseconds? The application backend was hosted on one continent, and the inference cluster was hosted on the other side of the planet. Routing synchronous traffic over the public internet halfway across the world guarantees terrible performance.
Your latency service level agreement is physically impossible if your network topology is garbage. Keep your inference network peered directly to your application backend network via enterprise transit routers. Never route inference traffic over the public internet.
4.2 Dynamic Batching (The Throughput Multiplier)
4.2.1 Starving the Compute
If you handle real-time requests sequentially, you are starving your hardware. These systems are designed for massive parallel processing. If you feed top-tier silicon one request at a time, you are using about two percent of its actual compute capacity.
Dynamic batching isn’t optional; it is the literal difference between a profitable feature and a bankrupting one.
4.2.2 Configuration Mechanics
Here is how you configure it. You tell the serving engine to hold incoming requests for a tiny fraction of a second to build a batch before sending it to the execution cores.
Plaintext
name: "language_model"
dynamic_batching {
preferred_batch_size: [ 4, 8, 16 ]
# Wait 5ms to build a batch before executing.
max_queue_delay_microseconds: 5000
}
Delaying the queue by a mere 5 milliseconds allows the system to form batches, resulting in a massive throughput multiplier. Your end users will not notice 5 milliseconds of added wait time, but your finance team will absolutely notice the massive drop in infrastructure costs.
4.3 Quantization (Stop using FP32)
4.3.1 Memory Bandwidth Bottlenecks
Serving 32-bit floating-point models in production is an extreme anti-pattern. The bottleneck for generation isn’t compute speed; it is memory bandwidth. Moving giant 32-bit matrices from hardware memory to the processing cores takes physical time.
Compile and quantize your models to 8-bit integers. It shrinks the model’s memory footprint in half, drastically speeding up the memory transfer rate without degrading the response quality in any noticeable way for most commercial and enterprise use cases. Stop using standard web protocols for internal inference calls. They are simply too slow. Moving to persistent connections eliminates the handshake overhead, instantly shaving 20 to 30 milliseconds off every single request.
5. Cost Management & Real-World Economics
Hardware is commoditized. You are just renting silicon. But without strict architectural governance, heavy inference will completely obliterate your cloud budget.
Auditing companies spending massive amounts on raw compute instances frequently uncovers terrible resource management. Looking at their telemetry dashboards often reveals their actual utilization sitting at 12 percent. They are paying exorbitant amounts for 88 percent idle time. When migrating and optimizing, here is the exact financial operations playbook used to cut those bills by over half.
5.1 Spot Instances for Async Workloads
5.1.1 Redefining Real-Time
If your “real-time” requirement is actually just a user uploading a massive document and waiting 5 seconds for a classification result, do not put that on an expensive on-demand instance. Put it on a node pool using interruptible instances. These instances can be reclaimed by the provider, but for asynchronous queues, it does not matter. The job simply retries on another node. This cuts compute costs massively while maintaining acceptable user experience.
5.2 Fractional Allocation
5.2.1 Slicing the Hardware
Never dedicate an entire massive card to a tiny 200-megabyte classification model. Slice it logically. Run your embedding model, your classification model, and your moderation model all on the exact same physical hardware. Logical isolation prevents these models from stepping on each other’s memory space while maximizing your return on investment for that specific server.
5.3 The Scale-to-Zero Trap
5.3.1 The Cold Start Reality
Managed services heavily advertise their support for scaling to zero. It sounds great for saving money overnight when traffic dips. Do not do it in production for critical synchronous paths. Pulling a 20-gigabyte language model from object storage on a cold start takes anywhere from 3 to 5 minutes depending on network bandwidth. Your users will not stare at a loading spinner for 5 minutes; they will close the application and go to your competitor. Always set a minimum replica count of at least one for critical user-facing paths.
Stop bleeding cash on unoptimized infrastructure. Are your compute costs scaling faster than your actual revenue? Deep-dive audits are required to right-size your infrastructure and eliminate waste. Request an Infrastructure Audit.
6. Failure Cases & Lessons Learned
These are the scars obtained from running high-traffic systems in production. Do not learn these the hard way. Learn from established architectural mistakes.
6.1 Failure 1: The SNAT Port Exhaustion Outage
6.1.1 The Outage Mechanics
A recommendation engine scaled up from 5 to 50 pods during a massive traffic spike. The inference pods needed to make outbound application programming interface calls to a third-party service to enrich user data before running the complex prediction.
Suddenly, the entire cluster lost outbound internet access. Everything crashed. Why? Those 50 pods made thousands of concurrent outbound connections, instantly exhausting the Network Address Translation Gateway’s available source ports. Transmission Control Protocol connections linger in a time-wait state, eating up ephemeral ports rapidly under high concurrency.
6.1.2 The Infrastructure Fix
A single IP address on a gateway only has about 55,000 usable ports. For high-throughput microservices, that is absolutely nothing. Always provision a gateway with multiple IP addresses to distribute the pool.
Here is the infrastructure code fix to save you from a major outage during your next launch:
Terraform
resource "alicloud_nat_gateway" "ai_nat" {
vpc_id = alicloud_vpc.ai_vpc.id
vswitch_id = alicloud_vswitch.ai_vsw.id
nat_gateway_name = "outbound-traffic-nat"
}
# Attach multiple IPs to prevent port exhaustion during scale-up events
resource "alicloud_eip_address" "nat_ips" {
count = 3
bandwidth = "100"
}
resource "alicloud_snat_entry" "multi_ip_snat" {
snat_table_id = alicloud_nat_gateway.ai_nat.snat_table_ids
source_vswitch_id = alicloud_vswitch.ai_vsw.id
# Join the IPs to create a massive port pool
snat_ip = join(",", alicloud_eip_address.nat_ips[*].ip_address)
}
6.2 Failure 2: The Monolithic Python Bottleneck
6.2.1 The Global Interpreter Lock
A machine learning team bundled central processing unit-heavy data pre-processing (like resizing images and tokenizing text) and heavy model inference into a single monolithic Python application.
Python utilizes a Global Interpreter Lock. It can only execute one thread at a time natively. The standard processor got completely choked trying to process the incoming images, which meant it could not feed data to the accelerated hardware fast enough. They had expensive silicon sitting completely idle 80 percent of the time because a simple script could not hand it data quickly enough.
6.2.2 Architectural Decoupling
Decouple the architecture immediately. Writing pre-processing APIs in a highly concurrent language like Go or Rust solves this. The new service handles the web traffic, resizes the images incredibly fast, and then calls a dedicated serving container via an ultra-fast connection to do the actual inference math. Hardware utilization will shoot up to expected enterprise levels.
6.3 Failure 3: The IOPS Chokehold
6.3.1 Storage Speed Limitations
Deploying a massive 40-gigabyte model onto top-tier compute instances should theoretically be fast. However, during a scale-up event, the new nodes took almost 15 minutes to become ready to serve traffic.
The bottleneck was not the compute tier. The problem was attaching a cheap, low-tier cloud disk to the instance. The network pulled the model from storage quickly, but writing that massive file to the slow disk, and then loading it from the slow disk into the compute memory, bottlenecked the entire process. For inference nodes, always use high-performance block storage. Scaling velocity is deeply, deeply dependent on disk read speeds. If your disk is slow, your scaling is slow.
7. Security and Observability: Operating in the Dark
You cannot run enterprise workloads without paranoid security and obsessive monitoring. Treating your inference nodes like a standard web server ensures you will be breached, or you will experience silent failures that degrade user experience without triggering a single automated alert.
7.1 Deep Observability
7.1.1 Moving Beyond Basic Metrics
If you are only monitoring standard processor and memory utilization, you are flying blind. Deployments often show standard metrics at 20 percent utilization, but all inference requests are timing out. Why? Because the specialized hardware memory is fragmented and throwing out-of-memory errors that the standard web dashboard simply cannot see.
7.1.2 Granular Tracking
You must export deep hardware metrics to your monitoring stack. Tracking compute utilization percentage, memory allocation and fragmentation, queue times (how long a request sits waiting for a batch), and execution times (how long the actual math takes) is mandatory. If your queue time is spiking but your execution time is flat, your hardware is fine, but you need more replicas. If your execution time is spiking, you are hitting thermal throttling or hardware limits. You cannot diagnose these specific issues without granular metrics.
7.2 Strict Network Security
7.2.1 Protecting Intellectual Property
Foundation models are highly valuable intellectual property. The data being fed into them is often highly sensitive customer information.
Never use long-lived access keys embedded in your code to pull models from storage. Use identity and access management roles attached directly to the compute instance. This ensures that even if a container is somehow compromised, the blast radius is tightly contained to that specific node. Furthermore, ensure that all data in transit between your application backend and your inference cluster is encrypted, even if it is running entirely inside a private network. Zero-trust networking applies to artificial intelligence infrastructure just as much as it applies to financial databases.
8. Production Best Practices
If you want extremely high availability—and you want to sleep through the night without on-call alerts waking you up at 3 AM—implement these three reliability rules immediately.
8.1 Data Caching Layers
8.1.1 Eradicating Cold Starts
Relying on object storage to pull massive models over the network every time an autoscaler spins up a new pod is a death sentence for your response time agreements. Deploy a distributed caching layer in your cluster’s memory architecture. When a new pod spins up, it pulls the weights from the local network memory tier rather than a distant storage bucket. This completely alters the scaling dynamics, dropping cold start times from 3 minutes to about 15 seconds.
8.2 Shadow Deployments
8.2.1 Mitigating Model Regression
Never do in-place upgrades of models. You have absolutely no idea how a new model version will behave with live, messy user data. It might hallucinate terribly. It might have a weird latency regression that did not show up in testing environments. Use a service mesh to route a mirrored, completely silent copy of live traffic to your new model. The user gets the response from the old, stable model, but the new one processes the exact same data in the background. Monitor the new model’s latency and accuracy for 24 hours before confidently flipping the switch.
8.3 Deep Health Probes
8.3.1 True Hardware Validation
If your readiness probe is just a basic script checking if a web endpoint returns a success status code, you are making a massive mistake. The web server might be perfectly healthy, but the underlying execution kernel might have panicked, or the hardware might be throwing errors internally. Your probe must execute a lightweight, dummy inference request to verify the actual hardware path is responsive before the load balancer is allowed to route real user traffic to it.
9. Conclusion: Stop Experimenting, Start Scaling
Architecting real-time inference pipelines is not simply about deploying some neat code snippets. It is an exercise in balancing hardware acceleration against network physics, cross-border compliance laws, and ruthless unit costs.
Experimenting with unoptimized scripts running on massive, un-partitioned virtual machines must stop. It is bad engineering and it is terrible for your business viability. By leveraging managed services for velocity, container orchestration for granular density, and rigorous networking configurations to prevent bottlenecks, achieving a resilient, highly profitable infrastructure is entirely possible.
Ready to turn your models into production-grade pipelines? Whether you are launching a global software product, navigating the complexities of entering new international markets, or just trying to get your cloud infrastructure bill under control, certified architects have built this before. We can build the pipeline you actually need to scale.
Schedule Your Discovery Call Today to discuss your deployment, find those hidden architectural bottlenecks, and build a solution that actually works in the real world.
Read more: 👉 Alibaba Cloud AI Pricing and Cost Optimization Guide
Read more: 👉 Deep Learning Training Using Alibaba Cloud GPU Instances